Cognitive Load Theory - 2

Could you be doing these small things that actually make it harder for your learners?
This article continues the series about cognitive load and introduces three more items to add to the list of things we may be doing that actually adds to the cognitive load of our learners.

In this article, I want to build on the information shared in the first article to explore extraneous load and the use of images and diagrams.
Use of images brings two things to a crossroad:
The way information is presented can increased cognitive load
Knowledge that our brains process images more rapidly than text
Research has shown that our brains can get the gist of a visual with one glance, whereas it takes a fraction longer for written language comprehension. So then, the thinking can be that use of images is necessary to reduce cognitive load and aid easier understanding for learners.
It's true that nobody really enjoys presentations with slides full of dense text or sites without images to break up the lines of words. However, just sticking in an image or a diagram is not the simple answer. It's more complicated than that. You see, there are a few circumstances when use of an image will distinctly increase cognitive load.
Firstly, this can occur when the image is not related to the text and is inserted to 'decorate' or make the content look flashy or prettier than just plain old text ...

Or when the image is an obscure "inside joke" or representation of the presenter's humour that not everyone is likely to "get".

Instead, include images when they support or can replace the written text.
For example:

Secondly, use of images or diagrams can increase cognitive load if the layout of the diagram forces split attention. Split attention is the cognitive learning phenomenon that happens when people are forced to look back and forth between separate sources of information to make sense of something.

By contrast, if a diagram is presented like the one below, the brain is not forced to use up valuable memory space just looking back and forth and matching labels to pictures. Instead, it takes in the label as it is positioned on the image.

Thirdly, and somewhat related to the split attention example above, if there is too much clutter in an image or diagram, the brain has to slow down to take in all of the information, make sense of it and attempt to commit to memory. Cognitive load increases with any combination of:
Confusing visual design
Excessive text
Unorganised information
Distracting graphics that force the brain to waste energy searching for relevant data

In particular, generative AI tools excel as creating infographics and diagrams that have high extraneous load. They might look pretty, but typically, they are cluttered with lots of detail crammed in.

Consider whether it takes more time to review the graphic above or simply read a summary such as:
5 Core Strategies to Support Novice Teachers
Staged onboarding
Help to manage workload
Peer support networks
Growth-oriented leadership
Access to ongoing, targeted PD
4-Stage PD Cycle
Identify skill needs
Access relevant learning
Measure impact
Apply new skills
etc.
When designing content for the purpose of assisting learners to take in and retain information, sometimes, plainer is better.
Assist learners by using images that:
Are relevant to the content and support the message; don't distract from it
Have integrated labels and that don't create a split attention effect
Cut the clutter - keep images simple and free from excessive detail
In our next article, we'll look at three more examples of things that add unnecessary mental effort.
This article is AITAS Rating 1
What is the AITAS?
20.10.26
Written by Michelle Charlton who has a degree in Behavioural Science (Psychology) and post-graduate degrees in Learning and Development, Learning Science, and Education Studies.
Image references:
